Blog Image
21 April, 2025

US SEC Delays Decision on Grayscale’s Ethereum Spot ETF Staking Proposal

US SEC Delays Decision on Grayscale’s Ethereum Spot ETF Staking Proposal

Summary

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has delayed its decision on Grayscale's request to include staking in its Ethereum Spot ETF. The SEC is being cautious because of concerns regarding investor protection, market manipulation, and the security of the Ethereum network. Staking, in which Ethereum token holders lock their coins to contribute to securing the network in exchange for a reward, has raised questions about whether or not it carries any risk when combined with an ETF. Most of the SEC's concerns are with ensuring that the ETF would not expose investors to abusive market practices and that the staking process is safe and transparent.

To make such concerns more manageable, Grayscale has left out the staking component from the proposal for smoother approval. The exclusion will better assuage regulatory worries and serve the SEC's investment product better. As much as the action will have the impact of speeding up approval, it is evidence of the ongoing balance between cryptocurrency innovation and regulatory conservatism.

Other applications for Ethereum ETFs remain under review, without any urgency in reaching the decision. The SEC overall strategy on cryptocurrency-backed ETFs is to balance security, transparency, and investor protection above everything else. Although some Ethereum ETFs have been greenlit without staking, the SEC still takes into account the likely impact of functionalities like staking, and the final approval may take time.

AD_4nXdkZ1P7IrgYnyk4FG6UU8nq9p7Nt-APjfVHBdxDXpK2PpM0wqIpmgyI-jQwFCwb16E0Nkiz3cgU1O14RTfxx2egPVvlh8NlnQuR8FqXdQPovAOHWW8QTQD790nkzt5_su8vLtYpEw?key=RcanxKT-f8Hg4LwNY_n2RJAG

Introduction

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has once more delayed its decision on Grayscale's Ethereum Spot Exchange-Traded Fund (ETF) application, which includes a staking plan for Ethereum. The delay has plunged the financial and cryptocurrency markets into uncertainty since many investors are eagerly waiting to see the approval process. The application, initially filed by Grayscale, is aimed at introducing an ETF that invests directly in Ethereum, the second-largest market-capitalized cryptocurrency.

What is unique about Grayscale's proposal is that it would like to allow its Ethereum ETF to participate in Ethereum staking, a mechanism by which Ethereum holders lock up their money to help secure the network and, in return, receive staking rewards. Those rewards would normally be paid out in additional Ethereum, and Grayscale would retain those staking rewards in the fund.

Grayscale, one of the largest cryptocurrency investment companies, has been advocating for the approval of this spot Ethereum ETF, as it would make Ethereum accessible to institutional investors. A spot ETF, as opposed to a futures-based ETF, mirrors the price of the underlying asset directly, in this instance, Ethereum. It provides investors with exposure to the cryptocurrency without having to hold it.

The decision of the SEC is awaited with bated breath by the world of cryptocurrencies. It has the potential to open the way for even more institutional investment in Ethereum and even in other cryptocurrencies. Approval would be a significant step in crypto assets' coming of age and one that takes them further towards mainstream financial markets.

Table of Contents: 

  • What Is the SEC's New Deadline? 

  • Why Is the SEC Delaying the Decision? 

  • What Is Grayscale's Proposal? 

  • How Will Staking Be Managed? 

  • What Are the SEC's Concerns?

  • Has Grayscale Removed the Staking Proposal? 

  • What Is the SEC's Broader Approach?

  • What Is the Status of Other Ethereum ETF Proposals? 

  • Conclusion

  • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ's)

What Is the SEC's New Deadline? 

SEC's new May 30, 2025 timeline for Grayscale's Ethereum Spot ETF staking proposal approval provides the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission additional time to read the proposal thoroughly and afterward decide if they are going to accept or reject it.

The SEC prefers taking their time whenever they have to read all the details, particularly when it concerns fresh and complex aspects such as cryptocurrency and staking.

By giving a longer period, the SEC is essentially saying that it wants to learn more about staking and if it is safe and equitable for investors. So, for now, we all have to wait until May 2025 for a clear answer.

Why Is the SEC Delaying the Decision? 

The SEC is holding off on the decision because it needs more time to thoroughly examine Grayscale's proposal and ensure everything is secure for investors. The proposal involves "staking," which is a mechanism for earning rewards by tying up Ethereum. As staking is a new concept for ETFs, the SEC wishes to research how it works, what risks it may have, and whether it may contribute to fraud or unfair trade practices.

They are also considering whether Ethereum's proof-of-stake mechanism is secure enough. In short, the SEC is being extremely cautious and wants to ensure that people's money is safe before finally approving it.

What Is Grayscale's Proposal? 

Grayscale, one of the top crypto investment companies, has submitted a proposal to enable its Ethereum ETFs—the Grayscale Ethereum Trust ETF and the Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust ETF—to engage in Ethereum staking. Staking is when Ethereum token holders "lock up" their ETH to protect the network and receive a reward in return.

Grayscale's proposal would allow the ETFs to stake part of their Ethereum holdings with established providers, which could boost investor yields. Notably, the staking will be held in the custody of the ETF sponsor, such that the staked ETH is not commingled with other parties' ETH and to preserve the staking to occur in addition to traditional custody arrangements.

The proposal has been submitted to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which has extended the deadline to June 1, 2025, to render its verdict. The SEC is considering granting an extended period to deliberate upon how staking added to ETFs would impact investor protection and the risks posed by Ethereum's proof-of-stake system.

How Will Staking Be Managed? 

Grayscale's Ethereum Spot ETF staking will be carried out by Grayscale itself. The company plans to stake the fund's Ethereum holdings through a well-established custodian, such as Coinbase Custody, which will hold the assets in custody.

The staked Ethereum will not be commingled with other funds, and the staking will be kept separate so that each of them is maintained unique. This will enable the fund to receive staking rewards without jeopardizing the security and ownership of the Ethereum that it holds.

What Are the SEC's Concerns?

The SEC has several issues with Grayscale's request. One of the main issues is that of market manipulation. Since Ethereum's proof-of-stake system is validator-based to secure the network, there is a concern that a group of validators could end up controlling too much power, which could affect the market unfairly.

The SEC is also concerned with the safety of staking and whether it can jeopardize the fund through hacking or fraud. The SEC also wants to make sure that staking does not cause any disruption in the overall functioning of the ETF and that investors are properly protected and everything is transparent.

Has Grayscale Removed the Staking Proposal? 

Yes, Grayscale has removed the staking proposal from its Ethereum ETF filing. In May 2024, the company revised its initial proxy statement to exclude the staking element, joining a larger industry movement and addressing the concerns of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) over staking in cryptocurrency exchange-traded funds (ETFs).

This was tried in trying to bypass regulatory hurdles and simplify the process of securing approval for the ETF. By excluding the staking proposal, Grayscale seeks to seize on the SEC's conservative approach towards cryptocurrency investment products. This follows a general industry trend whereby other issuers also excluded staking elements from their spot Ethereum ETF filings.

Therefore, the most recent version of Grayscale's Ethereum ETF proposal does not include staking, rather maintaining its emphasis on providing investment exposure to Ethereum in a traditional ETF vehicle. This is to meet the regulatory needs while still offering a vehicle by which institutional and retail investors can gain exposure to Ethereum.

What Is the SEC's Broader Approach?

The overall policy of the SEC with regard to investment products related to cryptocurrency like ETFs has been conservative and investor-protective. The SEC tends to be cautious in approaching proposals in an attempt to satisfy regulatory needs and not put investors at excessive risk due to fraud or market manipulation. The commission has been very cautious regarding the volatility of cryptocurrencies and the absence of regulation within the crypto market.

Generally speaking, the SEC wants these financial products to be open, safe, and run under well established policies protecting investors. To observe their influence on the market as well as whether they fit current financial rules, the SEC has postponed decision on various ideas like Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs.They also take into account the technology underpinning, including Ethereum's proof-of-stake system, and how this will affect the stability and equitability of the market.

The SEC's conservative approach has led to delay and dismissal of several of the crypto ETF proposals, but it has also pushed the industry to move towards greater security and transparency. The commission still goes on to ask the question of how cryptos and related products can be brought into mainline financial markets without compromising investor protection.

What Is the Status of Other Ethereum ETF Proposals? 

As of April 2025, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has licensed a few spot Ethereum exchange-traded funds (ETFs) such as BlackRock, Invesco Galaxy, and Fidelity. The ETFs launched in July 2024 and offered direct exposure to Ethereum for investors.However, on regulatory principles, ETFs are not integrated with staking capability.

The SEC also approved options trading in Ethereum ETFs, a significant step for the cryptocurrency investment sector. Investors can now purchase and sell Ethereum ETF options, boosting investment and flexibility prospects. Approvals for the options began in 2024 and ended in April of 2025.

In short, the SEC has moved ahead with approvals of spot Ethereum ETFs and options trading, but is proceeding slowly with applications that involve staking and other elements. The changing regulatory environment means further developments are to emerge in the next several months.

Conclusion

In short, the SEC's decision to delay Grayscale's Ethereum Spot ETF staking proposal is a confirmation of the regulatory body's risk-averse and cautious approach to investment products that are closely related to cryptocurrencies. What the SEC mainly does not want is for such products to be investor-safe, fraud- and manipulation-proof, and not contrary to existing financial regulations. Since the crypto ecosystem, and most specifically Ethereum's proof-of-stake, is still in its early stages and extremely dynamic, the SEC wants to make sure that all is properly vetted before allowing such products into the mainstream financial world.

Grayscale's first foray, staking in its Ethereum ETF, raised concerns over market risk as well as the protection of investors. The delays on the part of the SEC are evidence of its giving the matters at hand precedence over everything else before deciding anything. Even though this did cause some market uncertainty, it also evidences the tenacity of the SEC to protect investors and keep the financial climate stable. Thanks to regulator fears, Grayscale has now removed the staking aspect from the proposal, and this could potentially simplify the process of approval.

Alternative Ethereum ETFs are in development, some of them already experiencing analogous delays and criticisms from the SEC. That various proposals have later been approved without staking indicates, however, that there's growing interest in cryptocurrency-themed ETFs. They can offer exposure to Ethereum and other cryptocurrencies at a more accessible level for investors without the latter having to actually buy the underlying assets.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ's)

Que: What is Grayscale's Ethereum Spot ETF staking proposal?

Ans: Grayscale had proposed a strategy to include staking in its Ethereum Spot ETF. Staking means keeping Ethereum locked up in order to earn rewards, and Grayscale wanted to allow its ETF to engage in this activity in order to offer investors better returns.

 

Que: Why is the SEC not making a speedy decision on Grayscale's proposal?

Ans: SEC is delaying its approval to ensure Ethereum staking is safe for the investors and it does not leave them vulnerable to market manipulation and fraud. The SEC wants a little more time to consider what staking means and how staking would potentially impact the ETF and the larger market.

 

Que: Why is SEC so concerned about Grayscale's proposed staking proposal?

Ans: The SEC's main issues are market manipulation potential, the security of Ethereum staking, and if it can potentially disrupt the ETF. They are also worried about the potential for uneven conduct and the lack of regulation in the crypto universe.

 

Que: Did Grayscale abandon the staking proposal?

Ans: Yes, the staking component has been omitted from Grayscale's Ethereum Spot ETF filing in response to SEC concerns. This was carried out to simplify the approval process and align with the SEC's risk-averse attitude toward crypto-based investment products.

 

Que: What is the SEC's overall game plan when it comes to cryptocurrency-based ETFs?

Ans: The SEC has been very conservative in approving the cryptocurrency ETFs, as the SEC is generally concerned with protecting investors from potential risks. The SEC wants such products to be safe, transparent, and avoid subjecting the investors to higher-than-normal degrees of risks such as market scams or manipulation.

 

We may use cookies or any other tracking technologies when you visit our website, including any other media form, mobile website, or mobile application related or connected to help customize the Site and improve your experience. Learn More